- What is the theory of action of the Gates initiative focused on the instructional tools?
- Do teachers believe that the tools are strong models for teaching literacy and math?
- What were the experiences of teachers as they developed and implemented the literacy and math tools? What were their successes and what were their challenges?
- What kinds of supports did teachers receive and how did this vary (e.g., by content area, school, district)?
- What are the conditions necessary to best support the successful adoption of the tools at the building level? District and local level?
- Questions 3-5 are great qualitative questions around the LDC project. These ancillary questions could really be used to support a solid research question.
- Question 1 makes little sense for any research. Your theory of research is not a question, but your framework and basis grounded in educational theory. I would hope they could answer the question without conducting any educational research in the field. Although they failed to do so in their report and have 0 references cited. This is why the research is not published in a peer-reviewed journal.
- Question 2 is a yes/no answer. Research questions should never be answered with yes/no. That's educational research 101.
If I were to write a research question here is what it would be:
- What are the effects of the Literacy Design Collaborative on student achievement?
This can be quantified and gets at the heart of what we should really be asking.
- Is this tool effective? How effective?
- Does it result in any statistically significant difference from current practices?
- Is it better than other implementations of the new Common Core Standards?
All answered with a pre/post design.
No comments:
Post a Comment